← Back

Word Order, Possession & Grammatical Relations

How Indonesian expresses subject, object and possession without any case system
Relasi gramatikal dikodekan secara konfigurasional
Grammatical relations encoded purely configurationally
position-based
Indonesian relies on structural position, not morphology, for relations
Strategi topikalisasi dan pemindahan ke kiri
Topicalization and left-dislocation strategies
-
Fronting an element to the far left highlights it as the topic
Pasif di- sebagai perangkat mirip-kasus/struktur informasi
Passive di- as a case-like/information-structural device
-
Voice choice reorganizes which argument becomes prominent
milik-posesif vs posesif berjajar
milik-possessive vs juxtaposed possessive: register/explicitness
-
Explicit milik adds formality or clarity to a possession relation
Sufiks aplikatif -kan/-i menambah/mempromosikan partisipan
Applicative-like suffixes -kan/-i adding or promoting participants
-
These suffixes can bring a new argument into the clause
Sistem suara simetris: suara aktor vs suara pasien
Symmetrical voice system: actor voice vs undergoer voice reordering
-
Both voices are equally "basic" — not a marked/unmarked pair
Fleksibilitas urutan argumen dengan -kan
Double object verbs and argument order flexibility with -kan
-
-kan can shift which argument appears in which position
dengan, untuk, oleh
coverb-like prepositions marking semantic roles
-
Small function words assign roles that case would mark elsewhere
Elipsis argumen sesuai konteks wacana
Ellipsis of arguments recoverable from discourse context
-
Arguments are freely dropped once clear from context
Perbandingan sistem tanpa kasus Indonesia dengan Jerman/Yunani
Comparing Indonesian's caseless system to case-marking languages
-
A useful contrast if you've studied German or Greek